What Claude (Anthropic) with web search answered for applicant tracking systems (remote teams) on 2026-10-26

Claude (Anthropic) with web search claude-opus-5 asked 2026-10-26

Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.

The question asked, verbatim: best applicant tracking systems for remote teams

Brands named, in the order the engine gave

1. Ashby recommended
   Ashby - My default pick for a remote team of ~15-200.
2. Greenhouse recommended
   Greenhouse - The pick if structured hiring is the point.
3. Workable recommended
   Workable - Best value when you want transparent pricing and fast setup.
4. Deel recommended
   Deel - Worth it specifically if you're already hiring contractors or using Deel as an EOR.
5. Lever recommended
   Lever - Choose this over Greenhouse if you do more outbound sourcing than inbound.
6. Choose recommended
   Lever - Choose this over Greenhouse if you do more outbound sourcing than inbound.
7. Teamtailor recommended
   Teamtailor - Strong if employer branding is your bottleneck.
8. BambooHR recommended
   BambooHR - Not the best ATS, but the right answer if you want one system for hiring and HR records for a sub-50-person distributed team and don't want to run two vendors.
9. JazzHR mentioned
   Budget options I'd name if cost is the binding constraint: JazzHR and Zoho Recruit (cheap, competent, noticeably less polished), and Breezy HR for its visual kanban pipeline.
10. Zoho mentioned
    Budget options I'd name if cost is the binding constraint: JazzHR and Zoho Recruit (cheap, competent, noticeably less polished), and Breezy HR for its visual kanban pipeline.
11. Zoho Recruit mentioned
    Budget options I'd name if cost is the binding constraint: JazzHR and Zoho Recruit (cheap, competent, noticeably less polished), and Breezy HR for its visual kanban pipeline.
12. Breezy mentioned
    Budget options I'd name if cost is the binding constraint: JazzHR and Zoho Recruit (cheap, competent, noticeably less polished), and Breezy HR for its visual kanban pipeline.
13. Breezy HR mentioned
    Budget options I'd name if cost is the binding constraint: JazzHR and Zoho Recruit (cheap, competent, noticeably less polished), and Breezy HR for its visual kanban pipeline.
14. Remote mentioned
    One note: Remote.com is marketing an ATS but it's still listed as launching during 2026 - today they mainly integrate with Greenhouse, so I wouldn't buy them for the ATS yet.

Sources the engine cited

Is one of these your site? Its page lists every recorded answer that cited it, with the questions, the pages and the dates, and carries the alert for the next citation.

The answer, as recorded

Here's what I'd actually recommend, roughly in order: **1. Ashby** - My default pick for a remote team of ~15-200. It bundles ATS + CRM + scheduling + analytics in every tier instead of nickel-and-diming for add-ons, and the scheduling engine handles multi-timezone interview loops better than anything else I've used. Foundations starts around $300-400/mo for up to 100 employees; Plus/Enterprise is custom and can climb steeply. ([costbench.com](https://costbench.com/compare/greenhouse-vs-ashby), [pin.com](https://pin.com/blog/ashby-pricing/)) **2. Greenhouse** - The pick if structured hiring is the point. Interview kits, scorecards, and per-stage rubrics force consistency, which matters more for remote hiring because you lose all the informal in-office signal. Downside: no public pricing, no trial, and reported quotes run ~$6k-$27k/yr. ([yardstick.team](https://yardstick.team/ats-pricing-comparison)) **3. Workable** - Best value when you want transparent pricing and fast setup. Published tiers ($299/$599/$719/mo, or a flat ~$250/mo for teams under 25), strong job-board syndication, and non-recruiters can navigate it without training. AI screening is billed per credit on top. ([100hires.com](https://100hires.com/workable-vs-greenhouse.html), [joinhomebase.com](https://www.joinhomebase.com/blog/applicant-tracking-system-for-small-business)) **4. Deel** - Worth it specifically if you're already hiring contractors or using Deel as an EOR. Their ATS is priced per hire (~$99) and flows straight into contracts, onboarding, and payroll across countries, so you skip the ATS→HRIS→payroll handoff that usually breaks on international hires. Weaker as a pure recruiting tool. ([deel.com](https://www.deel.com/solutions/hire/ats/)) **5. Lever** - Choose this over Greenhouse if you do more outbound sourcing than inbound. The ATS+CRM combination is built for nurturing pipelines months ahead of an open req, which suits niche remote roles where there are only ~50 qualified people worldwide. ([remotelytalents.com](https://www.remotelytalents.com/blog/applicant-tracking-systems-comparison)) **6. Teamtailor** - Strong if employer branding is your bottleneck. It doubles as a careers-site builder, which helps when you have no office to sell and the careers page *is* your first impression. Popular with European teams. ([remotelytalents.com](https://www.remotelytalents.com/blog/applicant-tracking-systems-comparison)) **7. BambooHR** - Not the best ATS, but the right answer if you want one system for hiring *and* HR records for a sub-50-person distributed team and don't want to run two vendors. ([peoplemanagingpeople.com](https://peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/top-10-applicant-tracking-systems-for-small-businesses/)) Budget options I'd name if cost is the binding constraint: **JazzHR** and **Zoho Recruit** (cheap, competent, noticeably less polished), and **Breezy HR** for its visual kanban pipeline. ([capterra.com](https://www.capterra.com/resources/best-applicant-tracking-system/)) One note: Remote.com is marketing an ATS but it's still listed as launching during 2026 - today they mainly integrate with Greenhouse, so I wouldn't buy them *for* the ATS yet. ([remote.com](https://remote.com/global-hr/ats)) If you want one answer: **Ashby** for a funded startup, **Workable** if you want to see the price before you talk to a salesperson.

Near this answer

The same question, recorded on other dates: 2026-10-24, 2026-10-22, 2026-10-19, 2026-10-18, 2026-10-16, 2026-10-14, 2026-10-12, 2026-10-11, 2026-10-09, 2026-10-06, 2026-10-03.

applicant tracking systems, asked for other audiences: small businesses (asked 2026-10-26).

Other categories with a recorded answer: background check services, benefits administration software, contractor management platforms, employee engagement software.

Play this answer: which brand was named first?

Markdown edition · JSON record · the question page, with every recording · Answer Watch · AEO Watch

Answer Watch records what one AI answer engine said on one date, nothing more. Each page names the engine and the model, carries the date the question was asked, and lists the brands that appeared in the answer in the order the engine gave them, with the sources it cited. It is a measurement, not a ranking, not a recommendation and not a claim about the world. Brands that did not appear in an answer are not named on any public page. Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.