# What Claude (Anthropic) with web search answered for privacy policy generators (startups) on 2026-09-24

## In short

On 2026-09-24, Claude (Anthropic) with web search was asked "best privacy policy generators for startups". It named 9 brands; the first six, in order, were Termly, US, third-party, Stripe, Mixpanel and Intercom.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Question | best privacy policy generators for startups |
| Asked on | 2026-09-24 |
| Engine | Claude (Anthropic) with web search |
| Model | claude-opus-5 |
| Brands named | 9 |
| Sources cited | 6 |
| Audience | startups |
| Coverage | Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included. |
| Last verified | 2026-09-24 |

Page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/s/privacy-policy-generators-startups-2026-09-24
Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.

## The answer, as recorded

Asked on 2026-09-24 through Claude (Anthropic) with web search (model claude-opus-5).

> Here's what I'd actually recommend, roughly in the order I'd try them:
> 
> **1. Termly** - my default suggestion for most startups. Attorney-backed templates, a genuinely usable free tier (one full policy, no content restrictions), and it auto-updates as laws change. Paid starts around $10-14/month. The generator asks business-specific questions (do you use analytics, do you sell data, do you serve CA/VA/CO residents) rather than just filling in your company name. Best balance of "good enough to actually rely on" and "free to start."
> 
> **2. iubenda** - the pick if you have any non-US footprint. Broadest feature set under one subscription: privacy policy, cookie policy, ToS, consent banner, 27 languages, 2,400+ pre-vetted clauses covering specific third-party services (Stripe, Mixpanel, Intercom, etc.). Essentials is ~$5.99/month per site; Advanced ~$24.99. The per-site pricing bites if you run multiple products.
> 
> **3. GetTerms** - the cheap, no-nonsense option. Flat ~$49-69/year, clean interface, covers privacy policy + cookie policy + ToS. Good for solo founders and pre-revenue startups who need something defensible on the site today and will revisit it at Series A.
> 
> **4. Osano** - on

## Brands named, in the order the engine gave

| Position | Brand | How it was named |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Termly | recommended |
| 2 | US | recommended |
| 3 | third-party | recommended |
| 4 | Stripe | recommended |
| 5 | Mixpanel | recommended |
| 6 | Intercom | recommended |
| 7 | GetTerms | recommended |
| 8 | Osano | recommended |
| 9 | PrivacyPolicies.com | recommended |

## Sources the engine cited

- https://www.iubenda.com/en/blog/best-privacy-policy-generators/ (other)
- https://privacycomply.io/iubenda-vs-termly-vs-osano.html (other)
- https://termly.io/resources/compare/termly-vs-iubenda/ (vendor)
- https://usercentrics.com/guides/privacy-policy/best-privacy-policy-generator/ (other)
- https://expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-privacy-policy-generator-software-solutions (other)
- https://consently.net/blog/iubenda-vs-termly (other)

The question page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/q/privacy-policy-generators/startups

Answer Watch records what one AI answer engine said on one date, nothing more. Each page names the engine and the model, carries the date the question was asked, and lists the brands that appeared in the answer in the order the engine gave them, with the sources it cited. It is a measurement, not a ranking, not a recommendation and not a claim about the world. Brands that did not appear in an answer are not named on any public page. Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.