# What Claude (Anthropic) with web search answered for disaster recovery services (remote teams) on 2026-10-13

## In short

On 2026-10-13, Claude (Anthropic) with web search was asked "best disaster recovery services for remote teams". It named 20 brands; the first six, in order, were Afi.ai, Microsoft, Microsoft 365, Google, Google Workspace and SharePoint.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Question | best disaster recovery services for remote teams |
| Asked on | 2026-10-13 |
| Engine | Claude (Anthropic) with web search |
| Model | claude-opus-5 |
| Brands named | 20 |
| Sources cited | 8 |
| Audience | remote teams |
| Coverage | Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included. |
| Last verified | 2026-10-13 |

Page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/s/disaster-recovery-services-remote-teams-2026-10-13
Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.

## The answer, as recorded

Asked on 2026-10-13 through Claude (Anthropic) with web search (model claude-opus-5).

> For a remote team, "disaster recovery" usually means something different than it does for a company with a server room. Your data lives in SaaS tenants and on laptops scattered across time zones - not in a datacenter you'd fail over. So here's what I'd actually buy, in order:
> 
> **1. Afi.ai - backup for Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace.** This is the first thing I'd put in place. Google and Microsoft do *not* back up your tenant in a meaningful way; retention windows are short and a deleted-then-purged Drive folder or a ransomwared OneDrive is gone. Afi covers Exchange, OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, Drive, Gmail, Calendar, with unlimited retention, immutable versions, and ransomware detection. Around $3/user/month, five-user minimum - cheap insurance for the data a remote team actually lives in. It scored top of the pack in TechRepublic's 2026 M365 roundup. ([techrepublic.com](https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-best-microsoft-365-backup-solutions/), [expertinsights.com](https://expertinsights.com/backup/backup-and-recovery-google-workspace))
> 
> **2. Druva (inSync) - endpoint backup for the laptops.** Cloud-native, no infrastructure to run, Windows + macOS, backups as often as eve

## Brands named, in the order the engine gave

| Position | Brand | How it was named |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Afi.ai | mentioned |
| 2 | Microsoft | mentioned |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | mentioned |
| 4 | Google | mentioned |
| 5 | Google Workspace | mentioned |
| 6 | SharePoint | mentioned |
| 7 | Druva | mentioned |
| 8 | CrashPlan | mentioned |
| 9 | Linux | mentioned |
| 10 | Keepit | mentioned |
| 11 | Veeam | mentioned |
| 12 | Datto SaaS Protection | mentioned |
| 13 | Datto SaaS Protection / Backupify | mentioned |
| 14 | Backupify | mentioned |
| 15 | AWS | mentioned |
| 16 | Zerto | mentioned |
| 17 | Acronis | mentioned |
| 18 | all-in-one | mentioned |
| 19 | Notion | mentioned |
| 20 | Microsoft 365 Backup | mentioned |

## Sources the engine cited

- https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-best-microsoft-365-backup-solutions/ (other)
- https://expertinsights.com/backup/backup-and-recovery-google-workspace (other)
- https://www.druva.com/comparison/druva-vs-crashplan (vendor)
- https://expertinsights.com/backup-and-recovery/top-endpoint-backup-solutions (other)
- https://us.fitgap.com/products/crashplan-for-endpoints (other)
- https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/aws-elastic-disaster-recovery-pricing (other)
- https://www.techrepublic.com/article/draas-providers/ (other)
- https://www.costbench.com/software/backup-recovery/ (other)

The question page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/q/disaster-recovery-services/remote-teams

Alerts and membership: Answer Watch Pro, 79 USD per month: https://bikoosh.com/answers. Bikoosh is monitoring assistance, not complete protection.

Answer Watch records what one AI answer engine said on one date, nothing more. Each page names the engine and the model, carries the date the question was asked, and lists the brands that appeared in the answer in the order the engine gave them, with the sources it cited. It is a measurement, not a ranking, not a recommendation and not a claim about the world. Brands that did not appear in an answer are not named on any public page. Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.