# What Claude (Anthropic) with web search answered for applicant tracking systems (remote teams) on 2026-09-29

## In short

On 2026-09-29, Claude (Anthropic) with web search was asked "best applicant tracking systems for remote teams". It named 12 brands; the first six, in order, were Ashby, Greenhouse, Workable, Lever, Deel and Breezy.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Question | best applicant tracking systems for remote teams |
| Asked on | 2026-09-29 |
| Engine | Claude (Anthropic) with web search |
| Model | claude-opus-5 |
| Brands named | 12 |
| Sources cited | 7 |
| Audience | remote teams |
| Coverage | Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included. |
| Last verified | 2026-09-29 |

Page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/s/applicant-tracking-systems-remote-teams-2026-09-29
Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.

## The answer, as recorded

Asked on 2026-09-29 through Claude (Anthropic) with web search (model claude-opus-5).

> Here's what I'd actually recommend, roughly in the order I'd shortlist them:
> 
> **1. Ashby** - My default recommendation for remote-first startups and scaleups (roughly 20-500 people). It combines ATS, scheduling, CRM, and genuinely good analytics in one product, and the scheduling engine handles multi-timezone interview panels better than anything else - which is the single biggest operational pain of remote hiring. Downside: pricing isn't public and it's not cheap.
> 
> **2. Greenhouse** - The right answer at enterprise scale and the reference standard for *structured* hiring: scorecards, interview kits, structured feedback. That structure matters more for remote teams than co-located ones, because you lose the informal "grab a coffee with the candidate" signal and have to replace it with discipline. Topped G2's Winter 2026 rankings. Heavier and pricier to administer.
> 
> **3. Workable** - Best mid-market pick. Transparent pricing, 200+ job board integrations covering most international markets, built-in async/one-way video interviews, and solid mobile apps so hiring managers scattered across timezones can move candidates along from a phone. Strongest "works out of the box" option.
> 
> **4. 

## Brands named, in the order the engine gave

| Position | Brand | How it was named |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashby | recommended |
| 2 | Greenhouse | recommended |
| 3 | Workable | recommended |
| 4 | Lever | recommended |
| 5 | Deel | recommended |
| 6 | Breezy | recommended |
| 7 | Breezy HR | recommended |
| 8 | Manatal | recommended |
| 9 | Zoho | recommended |
| 10 | Zoho Recruit | recommended |
| 11 | Gem | mentioned |
| 12 | SmartRecruiters | mentioned |

## Sources the engine cited

- https://www.spotsaas.com/blog/best-ats-tools-for-remote-hiring-teams/ (other)
- https://www.pin.com/blog/best-remote-recruitment-tools/ (other)
- https://www.pin.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems/ (other)
- https://www.lever.co/insights/best-remote-hiring-software (vendor)
- https://www.gem.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-system (vendor)
- https://avahr.com/ats-for-remote-hiring/ (other)
- https://weworkremotely.com/best-applicant-tracking-systems-for-remote-companies (other)

The question page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/q/applicant-tracking-systems/remote-teams

Alerts and membership: Answer Watch Pro, 79 USD per month: https://bikoosh.com/answers. Bikoosh is monitoring assistance, not complete protection.

Answer Watch records what one AI answer engine said on one date, nothing more. Each page names the engine and the model, carries the date the question was asked, and lists the brands that appeared in the answer in the order the engine gave them, with the sources it cited. It is a measurement, not a ranking, not a recommendation and not a claim about the world. Brands that did not appear in an answer are not named on any public page. Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.