# What Claude (Anthropic) with web search answered for applicant tracking systems (remote teams) on 2026-09-23

## In short

On 2026-09-23, Claude (Anthropic) with web search was asked "best applicant tracking systems for remote teams". It named 9 brands; the first six, in order, were Ashby, Greenhouse, Workable, Lever, Deel and Pinpoint.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Question | best applicant tracking systems for remote teams |
| Asked on | 2026-09-23 |
| Engine | Claude (Anthropic) with web search |
| Model | claude-opus-5 |
| Brands named | 9 |
| Sources cited | 9 |
| Audience | remote teams |
| Coverage | Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included. |
| Last verified | 2026-09-23 |

Page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/s/applicant-tracking-systems-remote-teams-2026-09-23
Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.

## The answer, as recorded

Asked on 2026-09-23 through Claude (Anthropic) with web search (model claude-opus-5).

> For remote/distributed teams, here's what I'd actually recommend, roughly in the order I'd suggest looking at them:
> 
> **1. Ashby** - My default pick for most remote-first companies. It bundles scheduling, CRM, and analytics into the core product rather than charging for them as add-ons, and its scheduling engine handles multi-timezone interview panels better than anything else in the category - which is the single biggest day-to-day pain of distributed hiring. Best fit for roughly 50-1,000 employees; Foundations starts around $400/month.
> 
> **2. Greenhouse** - The pick if you care most about structured, consistent hiring across a team that never sits in the same room. Scorecards and interview kits are its real value: they force rubric-based decisions instead of hallway consensus, which matters more when hiring managers are async. Downside: pricing is fully opaque (expect $8-25K/year at 100-500 staff) and scheduling/CRM cost extra.
> 
> **3. Workable** - The pragmatic choice for small teams without a dedicated recruiting ops person. Fast setup, clean UI, published pricing (~$299-719/month), and one of the better job-board distribution networks. One real catch: it prices on *total company h

## Brands named, in the order the engine gave

| Position | Brand | How it was named |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashby | recommended |
| 2 | Greenhouse | recommended |
| 3 | Workable | recommended |
| 4 | Lever | recommended |
| 5 | Deel | recommended |
| 6 | Pinpoint | recommended |
| 7 | Zoho Recruit | recommended |
| 8 | Gem | mentioned |
| 9 | Zapier | mentioned |

## Sources the engine cited

- https://www.gem.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-system (vendor)
- https://www.pinpointhq.com/insights/best-applicant-tracking-system (other)
- https://www.index.dev/blog/greenhouse-vs-lever-vs-ashby-ats-comparison (other)
- https://leonstaff.com/blogs/ats-pricing-comparison-2026/ (other)
- https://www.stackscored.com/pricing/ats-recruitment/ (other)
- https://treegarden.io/blog/best-ats-remote-companies-2026/ (other)
- https://www.deel.com/blog/deel-launches-ai-powered-ats/ (vendor)
- https://www.deel.com/blog/deel-vs-remote-honest-employer-of-record-service-comparison/ (vendor)
- https://zapier.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems/ (vendor)

The question page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/q/applicant-tracking-systems/remote-teams

Answer Watch records what one AI answer engine said on one date, nothing more. Each page names the engine and the model, carries the date the question was asked, and lists the brands that appeared in the answer in the order the engine gave them, with the sources it cited. It is a measurement, not a ranking, not a recommendation and not a claim about the world. Brands that did not appear in an answer are not named on any public page. Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.