# What Claude (Anthropic) with web search answered for applicant tracking systems (remote teams) on 2026-09-16

## In short

On 2026-09-16, Claude (Anthropic) with web search was asked "best applicant tracking systems for remote teams". It named 12 brands; the first six, in order, were Ashby, third-party, Greenhouse, Gem, Checkr and Workable.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Question | best applicant tracking systems for remote teams |
| Asked on | 2026-09-16 |
| Engine | Claude (Anthropic) with web search |
| Model | claude-opus-5 |
| Brands named | 12 |
| Sources cited | 6 |
| Audience | remote teams |
| Coverage | Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included. |
| Last verified | 2026-09-16 |

Page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/s/applicant-tracking-systems-remote-teams-2026-09-16
Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.

## The answer, as recorded

Asked on 2026-09-16 through Claude (Anthropic) with web search (model claude-opus-5).

> Here's who I'd actually name, roughly in the order I'd bring them up:
> 
> **1. Ashby** - My default recommendation for a remote-first company doing real volume. It bundles ATS, scheduling, CRM, and analytics natively rather than through add-ons, which matters when your recruiting coordinator isn't sitting next to anyone. The scheduling engine handles multi-timezone interview panels well, and the reporting is the best in the category without needing a BI tool bolted on. Downside: pricier and a thinner third-party integration ecosystem than Greenhouse. ([Gem](https://www.gem.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-system), [Greenhouse](https://www.greenhouse.com/blog/best-ats-software))
> 
> **2. Greenhouse** - The safe pick for mid-market and up, and what I'd choose if structured hiring is the priority. Scorecards, interview kits, and kit-driven consistency are its whole philosophy, which is exactly what keeps distributed hiring panels from devolving into vibes-based decisions. Biggest integration ecosystem of any ATS, and it held a 98% satisfaction score on G2's Winter 2026 reports. Overkill for a 15-person startup. ([Greenhouse](https://www.greenhouse.com/blog/best-ats-software), [Checkr](https

## Brands named, in the order the engine gave

| Position | Brand | How it was named |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashby | recommended |
| 2 | third-party | mentioned |
| 3 | Greenhouse | mentioned |
| 4 | Gem | mentioned |
| 5 | Checkr | mentioned |
| 6 | Workable | mentioned |
| 7 | Rippling | mentioned |
| 8 | Gusto | mentioned |
| 9 | Teamtailor | mentioned |
| 10 | BreezyHR | mentioned |
| 11 | Zoho | mentioned |
| 12 | Zoho Recruit | mentioned |

## Sources the engine cited

- https://www.gem.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-system (vendor)
- https://www.greenhouse.com/blog/best-ats-software (vendor)
- https://checkr.com/resources/articles/best-applicant-tracking-systems (vendor)
- https://jugglehire.com/blog/ats/ats-pricing-guide (other)
- https://gusto.com/resources/guides/best-ats-software (vendor)
- https://peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-applicant-tracking-systems/ (other)

The question page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/q/applicant-tracking-systems/remote-teams

Answer Watch records what one AI answer engine said on one date, nothing more. Each page names the engine and the model, carries the date the question was asked, and lists the brands that appeared in the answer in the order the engine gave them, with the sources it cited. It is a measurement, not a ranking, not a recommendation and not a claim about the world. Brands that did not appear in an answer are not named on any public page. Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.