# What Claude (Anthropic) with web search answered for applicant tracking systems (remote teams) on 2026-09-15

## In short

On 2026-09-15, Claude (Anthropic) with web search was asked "best applicant tracking systems for remote teams". It named 8 brands, in this order: Ashby, Greenhouse, Workable, Deel, Lever, Teamtailor.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Question | best applicant tracking systems for remote teams |
| Asked on | 2026-09-15 |
| Engine | Claude (Anthropic) with web search |
| Model | claude-opus-5 |
| Brands named | 8 |
| Sources cited | 6 |
| Audience | remote teams |
| Coverage | Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included. |
| Last verified | 2026-09-15 |

Page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/s/applicant-tracking-systems-remote-teams-2026-09-15
Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.

## The answer, as recorded

Asked on 2026-09-15 through Claude (Anthropic) with web search (model claude-opus-5).

> ## Best ATS for remote teams
> 
> **Ashby** - my default recommendation for distributed teams. Its scheduling engine handles multi-timezone, multi-interviewer panels better than anything else on the market, which is the single biggest operational pain of remote hiring. Built-in analytics mean you don't bolt on a separate reporting tool. Starts around $400/month for up to 100 employees, scaling to custom enterprise quotes.
> 
> **Greenhouse** - the safe enterprise choice. Deepest integration ecosystem (300+ tools), strong structured-interview scorecards that keep remote hiring consistent when no one shares an office. Entry around $4,000/year, with 100-500-person companies typically landing $8,000-$25,000.
> 
> **Workable** - best value for small remote teams without a recruiting ops person. Fast setup, transparent pricing (~$189-$599/month depending on headcount), AI screening included, and built-in job-board syndication across ~200 boards, which matters when you're sourcing globally rather than locally.
> 
> **Deel** - worth a serious look if "remote" means "international." It combines the ATS with EOR, contractor management, and global payroll, so a hire in Portugal or Brazil doesn't require a se

## Brands named, in the order the engine gave

| Position | Brand | How it was named |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashby | recommended |
| 2 | Greenhouse | mentioned |
| 3 | Workable | mentioned |
| 4 | Deel | mentioned |
| 5 | Lever | mentioned |
| 6 | Teamtailor | mentioned |
| 7 | Gem | mentioned |
| 8 | Zapier | mentioned |

## Sources the engine cited

- https://www.gem.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-system (vendor)
- https://zapier.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems/ (vendor)
- https://www.selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/applicant-tracking-systems (other)
- https://www.outsail.co/post/greenhouse-vs-lever-vs-ashby (other)
- https://leonstaff.com/blogs/ats-pricing-comparison-2026/ (other)
- https://www.pin.com/blog/ashby-pricing/ (other)

The question page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/q/applicant-tracking-systems/remote-teams

Answer Watch records what one AI answer engine said on one date, nothing more. Each page names the engine and the model, carries the date the question was asked, and lists the brands that appeared in the answer in the order the engine gave them, with the sources it cited. It is a measurement, not a ranking, not a recommendation and not a claim about the world. Brands that did not appear in an answer are not named on any public page. Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.