# What Claude (Anthropic) with web search answered for applicant tracking systems (remote teams) on 2026-09-11

## In short

On 2026-09-11, Claude (Anthropic) with web search was asked "best applicant tracking systems for remote teams". It named 14 brands, in this order: you're, Ashby, Shopify, Greenhouse, Gem, Workable.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Question | best applicant tracking systems for remote teams |
| Asked on | 2026-09-11 |
| Engine | Claude (Anthropic) with web search |
| Model | claude-opus-5 |
| Brands named | 14 |
| Sources cited | 17 |
| Audience | remote teams |
| Coverage | Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included. |
| Last verified | 2026-09-11 |

Page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/s/applicant-tracking-systems-remote-teams-2026-09-11
Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.

## The answer, as recorded

Asked on 2026-09-11 through Claude (Anthropic) with web search (model claude-opus-5).

> Here's what I'd recommend, in order. No ATS is really built only for remote teams. What matters for distributed hiring is scheduling across time zones, feedback that people can give on their own time, and permissions for hiring managers spread around the world. If you're hiring abroad, you also want a path from offer to compliant international employment.
> 
> 1. **Ashby.** This is where I'd start for most tech companies and startups (about 50-1,000 employees). It's often called the best fit for remote and distributed teams because of its advanced scheduling tools, and it also has strong analytics and automation. It claims interviews get scheduled about 40% faster than with older ATSs. Customers include OpenAI and Shopify. ([People Managing People](https://peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-applicant-tracking-systems/), [index.dev](https://www.index.dev/blog/greenhouse-vs-lever-vs-ashby-ats-comparison), [Plural](https://pluralcareers.com/resources/articles/greenhouse-vs-ashby-2026-comparison))
> 
> 2. **Greenhouse.** The standard choice for mid-size and larger companies (roughly 250+ employees) with a dedicated recruiting team. Its structured hiring workflows (scorecards and consistent in

## Brands named, in the order the engine gave

| Position | Brand | How it was named |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | you're | mentioned |
| 2 | Ashby | mentioned |
| 3 | Shopify | mentioned |
| 4 | Greenhouse | mentioned |
| 5 | Gem | mentioned |
| 6 | Workable | mentioned |
| 7 | Zapier | mentioned |
| 8 | Deel | mentioned |
| 9 | Deel ATS | mentioned |
| 10 | Breezy HR | mentioned |
| 11 | Teamtailor | mentioned |
| 12 | Lever | mentioned |
| 13 | Rippling | mentioned |
| 14 | Rippling Recruiting | mentioned |

## Sources the engine cited

- https://peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-applicant-tracking-systems/ (other)
- https://www.index.dev/blog/greenhouse-vs-lever-vs-ashby-ats-comparison (other)
- https://pluralcareers.com/resources/articles/greenhouse-vs-ashby-2026-comparison (other)
- https://www.pin.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems/ (other)
- https://www.gem.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-system (vendor)
- https://zapier.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems/ (vendor)
- https://www.worktechdesk.com/blog/greenhouse-vs-lever-vs-ashby/ (other)
- https://www.deel.com/solutions/hire/ats/ (vendor)
- https://www.selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/applicant-tracking-systems (other)
- https://ventureharbour.com/breezy-hr-review/ (other)
- https://www.authencio.com/blog/teamtailor-software-guide-features-pricing-pros-cons-alternatives (other)
- https://recruitee.com/blog/teamtailor-alternatives (other)
- https://blog.easyhireai.com/blog/recruiting-tools/ashby-vs-greenhouse-vs-lever-enterprise/ (other)
- https://www.rippling.com/products/hr/recruiting (vendor)
- https://augtal.com/blog/rippling-ats-review-2026/ (other)
- https://www.g2.com/categories/applicant-tracking-systems-ats (review)
- https://leonstaff.com/blogs/ats-pricing-comparison-2026/ (other)

The question page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/q/applicant-tracking-systems/remote-teams

Answer Watch records what one AI answer engine said on one date, nothing more. Each page names the engine and the model, carries the date the question was asked, and lists the brands that appeared in the answer in the order the engine gave them, with the sources it cited. It is a measurement, not a ranking, not a recommendation and not a claim about the world. Brands that did not appear in an answer are not named on any public page. Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.