# What Claude (Anthropic) with web search answered for applicant tracking systems (remote teams) on 2026-09-06

## In short

On 2026-09-06, Claude (Anthropic) with web search was asked "best applicant tracking systems for remote teams". It named 9 brands, in this order: Ashby, Greenhouse, Workable, Lever, Teamtailor, Breezy HR.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Question | best applicant tracking systems for remote teams |
| Asked on | 2026-09-06 |
| Engine | Claude (Anthropic) with web search |
| Model | claude-opus-5 |
| Brands named | 9 |
| Sources cited | 11 |
| Audience | remote teams |
| Coverage | Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included. |
| Last verified | 2026-09-06 |

Page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/s/applicant-tracking-systems-remote-teams-2026-09-06
Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.

## The answer, as recorded

Asked on 2026-09-06 through Claude (Anthropic) with web search (model claude-opus-5).

> ## Short answer, in the order I'd actually recommend them
> 
> **1. Ashby** - my default pick for a remote-first team under ~500 people. It bundles ATS + CRM + analytics + scheduling in one product, and the scheduling engine is the part that matters most when your interview panel is spread across five timezones. It's also the one data-driven teams consistently rank highest for reporting depth. Starts around $400/month, priced on company headcount, not recruiter seats. ([index.dev](https://www.index.dev/blog/greenhouse-vs-lever-vs-ashby-ats-comparison), [outsail.co](https://www.outsail.co/post/greenhouse-vs-lever-vs-ashby))
> 
> **2. Greenhouse** - the safest choice if you're mid-market/enterprise or hiring across countries. Its structured-hiring model (scorecards, defined interview kits, consistent rubrics) is genuinely the best defense against the location bias that creeps into distributed hiring, and it has ~500+ native integrations so it plugs into whatever payroll/EOR stack you already run. Highest customer satisfaction scores in the category. ([hrtechsaas.com](https://hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-ats-platforms-mid-market-companies/), [gem.com](https://www.gem.com/blog/best-applicant-track

## Brands named, in the order the engine gave

| Position | Brand | How it was named |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashby | mentioned |
| 2 | Greenhouse | mentioned |
| 3 | Workable | recommended |
| 4 | Lever | mentioned |
| 5 | Teamtailor | mentioned |
| 6 | Breezy HR | mentioned |
| 7 | Zoho Recruit | mentioned |
| 8 | Deel | recommended |
| 9 | Gem | mentioned |

## Sources the engine cited

- https://www.index.dev/blog/greenhouse-vs-lever-vs-ashby-ats-comparison (other)
- https://www.outsail.co/post/greenhouse-vs-lever-vs-ashby (other)
- https://hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-ats-platforms-mid-market-companies/ (other)
- https://www.gem.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-system (vendor)
- https://zapier.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems/ (other)
- https://www.lever.co/blog/greenhouse-vs-ashby (vendor)
- https://technologyadvice.com/applicant-tracking-systems/ (other)
- https://ventureharbour.com/best-free-ats/ (other)
- https://www.selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/free-applicant-tracking-systems (other)
- https://remote.com/blog/payroll/best-global-payroll-providers (other)
- https://fantastic.jobs/ats/rippling (other)

The question page: https://bikoosh.com/answers/q/applicant-tracking-systems/remote-teams

Answer Watch records what one AI answer engine said on one date, nothing more. Each page names the engine and the model, carries the date the question was asked, and lists the brands that appeared in the answer in the order the engine gave them, with the sources it cited. It is a measurement, not a ranking, not a recommendation and not a claim about the world. Brands that did not appear in an answer are not named on any public page. Coverage: Claude (Anthropic) with web search. Other engines not included.